<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IER Economist Murphy Takes on Nordhaus&#8217; Case for a Carbon Tax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2008/06/05/ier-economist-murphy-takes-on-nordhaus-case-for-a-carbon-tax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2008/06/05/ier-economist-murphy-takes-on-nordhaus-case-for-a-carbon-tax/</link>
	<description>for the well-being of mankind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:38:19 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Green Jobs: The Debate Is Over On This Issue, Too? &#8212; MasterResource</title>
		<link>http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2008/06/05/ier-economist-murphy-takes-on-nordhaus-case-for-a-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>Green Jobs: The Debate Is Over On This Issue, Too? &#8212; MasterResource</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 21:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/?p=144#comment-334</guid>
		<description>[...] I passed around my critique of Nordhaus&#8217; case for a carbon tax, a typical complaint was that I wasn&#8217;t a climate scientist, and so I had no business saying [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I passed around my critique of Nordhaus&#8217; case for a carbon tax, a typical complaint was that I wasn&#8217;t a climate scientist, and so I had no business saying [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Hansen, Climate Scientist and Leading Alarmist, Tells Obama His Version of the Truth &#8212; MasterResource</title>
		<link>http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2008/06/05/ier-economist-murphy-takes-on-nordhaus-case-for-a-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>James Hansen, Climate Scientist and Leading Alarmist, Tells Obama His Version of the Truth &#8212; MasterResource</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/?p=144#comment-292</guid>
		<description>[...] calls for a carbon tax, rather than the Trojan Horse of a cap &amp; trade program. I am quite skeptical, even if we concede the scientific claims that carbon emissions pose large negative externalities. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] calls for a carbon tax, rather than the Trojan Horse of a cap &amp; trade program. I am quite skeptical, even if we concede the scientific claims that carbon emissions pose large negative externalities. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Institute for Energy Research &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Flaws in the Economic Analysis of California&#8217;s AB 32 Scoping Plan</title>
		<link>http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2008/06/05/ier-economist-murphy-takes-on-nordhaus-case-for-a-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Institute for Energy Research &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Flaws in the Economic Analysis of California&#8217;s AB 32 Scoping Plan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 04:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/?p=144#comment-174</guid>
		<description>[...] warming assumed by Nordhaus. See IER economist Robert Murphy’s critique of Nordhaus available at: http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2008/06/05/ier-economist-murphy-takes-on-nordhaus-case-for.... However, the point above is that Nordhaus agrees that climate change mitigation policies carry a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] warming assumed by Nordhaus. See IER economist Robert Murphy’s critique of Nordhaus available at: <a href="http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2008/06/05/ier-economist-murphy-takes-on-nordhaus-case-for..." rel="nofollow">http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2008/06/05/ier-economist-murphy-takes-on-nordhaus-case-for&#8230;</a>. However, the point above is that Nordhaus agrees that climate change mitigation policies carry a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Article Under Peer Review Tackles Economic Case for Pricing Carbon &#124; Politics &#38; Economics on your MouseClicks!</title>
		<link>http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2008/06/05/ier-economist-murphy-takes-on-nordhaus-case-for-a-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Article Under Peer Review Tackles Economic Case for Pricing Carbon &#124; Politics &#38; Economics on your MouseClicks!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 19:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/?p=144#comment-27</guid>
		<description>[...] website is hosting a version of my paper that I recently submitted to an economics journal. (I&#039;m not telling you which one, in case they [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] website is hosting a version of my paper that I recently submitted to an economics journal. (I&#8217;m not telling you which one, in case they [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
