<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Levelized Cost of New Electricity Generating Technologies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2009/05/12/levelized-cost-of-new-generating-technologies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2009/05/12/levelized-cost-of-new-generating-technologies/</link>
	<description>for the well-being of mankind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:44:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2009/05/12/levelized-cost-of-new-generating-technologies/comment-page-2/#comment-1844</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 22:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/?p=3606#comment-1844</guid>
		<description>dear IER,

about my previous question, let me formulate it differently. The average retail sales price for electricity in the US is around 10 cents/kwh ($100 per Mwh). If you draw that $100 line inside the above graph, only 3 technologies go under that $100 line.
I don&#039;t get how technologies that are more expensive than the average retail price can be profitable.
Thanks a lot for your answer!
Ray</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dear IER,</p>
<p>about my previous question, let me formulate it differently. The average retail sales price for electricity in the US is around 10 cents/kwh ($100 per Mwh). If you draw that $100 line inside the above graph, only 3 technologies go under that $100 line.<br />
I don&#8217;t get how technologies that are more expensive than the average retail price can be profitable.<br />
Thanks a lot for your answer!<br />
Ray</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2009/05/12/levelized-cost-of-new-generating-technologies/comment-page-2/#comment-1843</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 21:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/?p=3606#comment-1843</guid>
		<description>dear IER,

thank you for this analysis. I was wondering, with this data in mind, it is possible that for example wind and solar can be profitable compared to other technologies? Even with carbon taxes, nuclear beats them all?
Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dear IER,</p>
<p>thank you for this analysis. I was wondering, with this data in mind, it is possible that for example wind and solar can be profitable compared to other technologies? Even with carbon taxes, nuclear beats them all?<br />
Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wayne leposavic</title>
		<link>http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2009/05/12/levelized-cost-of-new-generating-technologies/comment-page-2/#comment-1806</link>
		<dc:creator>wayne leposavic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/?p=3606#comment-1806</guid>
		<description>I like your graph comparing the cost od 20 different sources of energy. It would be even more useful if you provided also info how much CO2 is generated per kw of power, by each. Thank you.

Wane Leposavic, investor
Las Vegas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your graph comparing the cost od 20 different sources of energy. It would be even more useful if you provided also info how much CO2 is generated per kw of power, by each. Thank you.</p>
<p>Wane Leposavic, investor<br />
Las Vegas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Cudlin</title>
		<link>http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2009/05/12/levelized-cost-of-new-generating-technologies/comment-page-2/#comment-887</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Cudlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/?p=3606#comment-887</guid>
		<description>Just to be clear re natural gas prices.  Are the prices used based on the Henry Hub prices in Table A1?

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to be clear re natural gas prices.  Are the prices used based on the Henry Hub prices in Table A1?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2009/05/12/levelized-cost-of-new-generating-technologies/comment-page-2/#comment-883</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/?p=3606#comment-883</guid>
		<description>Andy, 

The fuel prices are determined by the model at  equilibruim. They can be found in Table A1 of the following link: http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/servicerpt/stimulus/pdf/sroiaf(2009)03.pdf.

Thanks,

Mary Hutzler</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy, </p>
<p>The fuel prices are determined by the model at  equilibruim. They can be found in Table A1 of the following link: <a href="http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/servicerpt/stimulus/pdf/sroiaf(2009)03.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/servicerpt/stimulus/pdf/sroiaf(2009)03.pdf</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Mary Hutzler</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Bowman</title>
		<link>http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2009/05/12/levelized-cost-of-new-generating-technologies/comment-page-1/#comment-878</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Bowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/?p=3606#comment-878</guid>
		<description>What are the prices of natural gas and coal (fuel factors) modeled in the analysis?  I went to the link with the assumptions but it only explained the methodology, not the actual prices used.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are the prices of natural gas and coal (fuel factors) modeled in the analysis?  I went to the link with the assumptions but it only explained the methodology, not the actual prices used.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2009/05/12/levelized-cost-of-new-generating-technologies/comment-page-1/#comment-866</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/?p=3606#comment-866</guid>
		<description>Koji,

The assumptions are contained in the report: Assumptions to the Annual Energy Outlook 2009 in the Electricity chapter. The link is: http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/assumption/electricity.html.

Thanks,

Mary Hutzler</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Koji,</p>
<p>The assumptions are contained in the report: Assumptions to the Annual Energy Outlook 2009 in the Electricity chapter. The link is: <a href="http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/assumption/electricity.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/assumption/electricity.html</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Mary Hutzler</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Koji</title>
		<link>http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2009/05/12/levelized-cost-of-new-generating-technologies/comment-page-1/#comment-861</link>
		<dc:creator>Koji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 06:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/?p=3606#comment-861</guid>
		<description>Dear IER:

Thank you for your Cost analysis.
I have some questions:

1) What discount rate did you use?
2) If there is summery of assumptions, please let me know.

Best regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear IER:</p>
<p>Thank you for your Cost analysis.<br />
I have some questions:</p>
<p>1) What discount rate did you use?<br />
2) If there is summery of assumptions, please let me know.</p>
<p>Best regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2009/05/12/levelized-cost-of-new-generating-technologies/comment-page-1/#comment-771</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/?p=3606#comment-771</guid>
		<description>Ed,

The number is conventional hydro. 


Thanks,

Mary Hutzler</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed,</p>
<p>The number is conventional hydro. </p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Mary Hutzler</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2009/05/12/levelized-cost-of-new-generating-technologies/comment-page-1/#comment-762</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/?p=3606#comment-762</guid>
		<description>Dear IER,

Is the hydro 114.1 number, conventional hydro, hydrokinetic, or combined? I ask because non-conventional hydro might be higher capacity factor.

thx
ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear IER,</p>
<p>Is the hydro 114.1 number, conventional hydro, hydrokinetic, or combined? I ask because non-conventional hydro might be higher capacity factor.</p>
<p>thx<br />
ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
