<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Production from Developing Manteo Prospect Offshore North Carolina vs. Equivalent Wind Farm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2010/04/14/production-from-developing-manteo-prospect-offshore-north-carolina-vs-equivalent-wind-farm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2010/04/14/production-from-developing-manteo-prospect-offshore-north-carolina-vs-equivalent-wind-farm/</link>
	<description>Institute for Energy Research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1 Offshore Natural Gas Platform = 59 Cape Wind Projects &#124; The Environment Online Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2010/04/14/production-from-developing-manteo-prospect-offshore-north-carolina-vs-equivalent-wind-farm/comment-page-3/#comment-6019</link>
		<dc:creator>1 Offshore Natural Gas Platform = 59 Cape Wind Projects &#124; The Environment Online Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 23:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/?p=5179#comment-6019</guid>
		<description>[...] here for an in-depth look at the facts and figures behind the Manteo/Cape Wind comparision.     Fatal error: Call to undefined function split_comments() in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here for an in-depth look at the facts and figures behind the Manteo/Cape Wind comparision.     Fatal error: Call to undefined function split_comments() in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Expensive Offshore Wind in Need of Customers &#124; Institute for Energy Research</title>
		<link>http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2010/04/14/production-from-developing-manteo-prospect-offshore-north-carolina-vs-equivalent-wind-farm/comment-page-3/#comment-5247</link>
		<dc:creator>Expensive Offshore Wind in Need of Customers &#124; Institute for Energy Research</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 14:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/?p=5179#comment-5247</guid>
		<description>[...] Production from Developing Manteo Prospect Offshore North Carolina vs. Equivalent Wind Farm [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Production from Developing Manteo Prospect Offshore North Carolina vs. Equivalent Wind Farm [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1 Offshore Natural Gas Platform = 59 Cape Wind Projects &#124; Institute for Energy Research</title>
		<link>http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2010/04/14/production-from-developing-manteo-prospect-offshore-north-carolina-vs-equivalent-wind-farm/comment-page-3/#comment-4717</link>
		<dc:creator>1 Offshore Natural Gas Platform = 59 Cape Wind Projects &#124; Institute for Energy Research</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/?p=5179#comment-4717</guid>
		<description>[...] Click here for an in-depth look at the facts and figures behind the Manteo/Cape Wind comparision. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Click here for an in-depth look at the facts and figures behind the Manteo/Cape Wind comparision. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cape Wind Power: What’s Cost Got To Do With It? &#171; PA Pundits &#8211; International</title>
		<link>http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2010/04/14/production-from-developing-manteo-prospect-offshore-north-carolina-vs-equivalent-wind-farm/comment-page-3/#comment-4699</link>
		<dc:creator>Cape Wind Power: What’s Cost Got To Do With It? &#171; PA Pundits &#8211; International</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/?p=5179#comment-4699</guid>
		<description>[...] of dollars in federal subsidies, and to replace one offshore natural gas platform, we would need 59 Cape Wind projects, which means more than 7,700 turbines covering an area the size of Rhode Island. We would need 24 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of dollars in federal subsidies, and to replace one offshore natural gas platform, we would need 59 Cape Wind projects, which means more than 7,700 turbines covering an area the size of Rhode Island. We would need 24 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cape Wind Power: What’s Cost Got to Do with It? &#124; The Foundry: Conservative Policy News.</title>
		<link>http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2010/04/14/production-from-developing-manteo-prospect-offshore-north-carolina-vs-equivalent-wind-farm/comment-page-2/#comment-4692</link>
		<dc:creator>Cape Wind Power: What’s Cost Got to Do with It? &#124; The Foundry: Conservative Policy News.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 17:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/?p=5179#comment-4692</guid>
		<description>[...] of dollars in federal subsidies, and to replace one offshore natural gas platform, we would need 59 Cape Wind projects, which means more than 7,700 turbines covering an area the size of Rhode Island. We would need 24 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of dollars in federal subsidies, and to replace one offshore natural gas platform, we would need 59 Cape Wind projects, which means more than 7,700 turbines covering an area the size of Rhode Island. We would need 24 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Cape Wind Boondoggle And What You Can Do &#171; motorcitytimes.com</title>
		<link>http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2010/04/14/production-from-developing-manteo-prospect-offshore-north-carolina-vs-equivalent-wind-farm/comment-page-2/#comment-3340</link>
		<dc:creator>The Cape Wind Boondoggle And What You Can Do &#171; motorcitytimes.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 00:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/?p=5179#comment-3340</guid>
		<description>[...] to Heritage: The Institute for Energy Research provides more details: “Overall, the project is estimated to have a maximum delivered capacity of 454 megawatts based [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to Heritage: The Institute for Energy Research provides more details: “Overall, the project is estimated to have a maximum delivered capacity of 454 megawatts based [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrs. Cape Wind Project And The Cape Cod Of NIMBY &#171; Around The Sphere</title>
		<link>http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2010/04/14/production-from-developing-manteo-prospect-offshore-north-carolina-vs-equivalent-wind-farm/comment-page-2/#comment-3308</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrs. Cape Wind Project And The Cape Cod Of NIMBY &#171; Around The Sphere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 14:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/?p=5179#comment-3308</guid>
		<description>[...] with renewables – both on-shore and off-shore. To replace one offshore natural gas platform we would need 59 Cape Wind projects, which means more than 7,700 turbines covering an area the size of Rhode Island. We would [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with renewables – both on-shore and off-shore. To replace one offshore natural gas platform we would need 59 Cape Wind projects, which means more than 7,700 turbines covering an area the size of Rhode Island. We would [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cape Wind and the Clean Energy Economy &#124; Conservative Principles Now</title>
		<link>http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2010/04/14/production-from-developing-manteo-prospect-offshore-north-carolina-vs-equivalent-wind-farm/comment-page-2/#comment-3276</link>
		<dc:creator>Cape Wind and the Clean Energy Economy &#124; Conservative Principles Now</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 12:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/?p=5179#comment-3276</guid>
		<description>[...] as a result. Indian tribes argue it will destroy sacred land.The Institute for Energy Research provides more details: “Overall, the project is estimated to have a maximum delivered capacity of 454 megawatts based [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as a result. Indian tribes argue it will destroy sacred land.The Institute for Energy Research provides more details: “Overall, the project is estimated to have a maximum delivered capacity of 454 megawatts based [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cape Wind and the Clean Energy Economy &#124; The Foundry: Conservative Policy News.</title>
		<link>http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2010/04/14/production-from-developing-manteo-prospect-offshore-north-carolina-vs-equivalent-wind-farm/comment-page-2/#comment-3252</link>
		<dc:creator>Cape Wind and the Clean Energy Economy &#124; The Foundry: Conservative Policy News.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/?p=5179#comment-3252</guid>
		<description>[...] as a result. Indian tribes argue it will destroy sacred land.The Institute for Energy Research provides more details: “Overall, the project is estimated to have a maximum delivered capacity of 454 megawatts based [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as a result. Indian tribes argue it will destroy sacred land.The Institute for Energy Research provides more details: “Overall, the project is estimated to have a maximum delivered capacity of 454 megawatts based [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: May Your Earth Day Glow Brightly &#124; Clean Technology Blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2010/04/14/production-from-developing-manteo-prospect-offshore-north-carolina-vs-equivalent-wind-farm/comment-page-2/#comment-3161</link>
		<dc:creator>May Your Earth Day Glow Brightly &#124; Clean Technology Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 02:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/?p=5179#comment-3161</guid>
		<description>[...] amounts of space. For instance, the Cape Wind project in the Nantucket Sound would consist of 130 wind turbines, spread across 25 square miles. Due to the intermittency of wind, it would take approximately 24 of these projects to produce the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] amounts of space. For instance, the Cape Wind project in the Nantucket Sound would consist of 130 wind turbines, spread across 25 square miles. Due to the intermittency of wind, it would take approximately 24 of these projects to produce the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

