<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wind</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/energy-overview/wind/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org</link>
	<description>Institute for Energy Research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wind Turbines Beneath Their Wings &#124; The Foundry</title>
		<link>http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/energy-overview/wind/comment-page-1/#comment-5955</link>
		<dc:creator>Wind Turbines Beneath Their Wings &#124; The Foundry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 13:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://206.71.175.70/~ieresearch/?page_id=43#comment-5955</guid>
		<description>[...] According to the Institute for Energy Research, wind turbines provide only ½ of 1% of America’s energy. Additionally, green energy technology like wind turbines typically cost more. In fact, the Department of Energy’s budget has increased by 76% in the past 10 years – in part to accommodate a huge increase in green energy methods. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] According to the Institute for Energy Research, wind turbines provide only ½ of 1% of America’s energy. Additionally, green energy technology like wind turbines typically cost more. In fact, the Department of Energy’s budget has increased by 76% in the past 10 years – in part to accommodate a huge increase in green energy methods. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IER&#8217;s Danish Wind Study: Response to Critics &#8212; MasterResource</title>
		<link>http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/energy-overview/wind/comment-page-1/#comment-875</link>
		<dc:creator>IER&#8217;s Danish Wind Study: Response to Critics &#8212; MasterResource</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 06:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://206.71.175.70/~ieresearch/?page_id=43#comment-875</guid>
		<description>[...] It is not surprising that electricity production from wind has expanded recently. Wind turbine designs have improved, but wind remains very expensive and as this list of subsidies, tax credits, and set-asides shows, the American taxpayer is footing the bill for the wind’s expansion. Even after decades of financial support, electricity from wind still only supplies 1.3% of all electricity generated in the US. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It is not surprising that electricity production from wind has expanded recently. Wind turbine designs have improved, but wind remains very expensive and as this list of subsidies, tax credits, and set-asides shows, the American taxpayer is footing the bill for the wind’s expansion. Even after decades of financial support, electricity from wind still only supplies 1.3% of all electricity generated in the US. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

